tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6571052.post5517475466340536670..comments2024-03-27T14:33:39.480-06:00Comments on Cathie from Canada: Some comments on the passing sceneCathie from Canadahttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11418899090537597360noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6571052.post-35757433378425317372023-05-26T17:17:02.543-06:002023-05-26T17:17:02.543-06:00From the Daily Scrum link above: "One prevail...From the Daily Scrum link above: "One prevailing theory is that if Poilievre is given access to factual information that debunks his many false narratives, it would severely hurt his misinformation campaign aimed at the Canadian people and put him in line with the government."<br /><br />I don't buy it. PP's never let the truth limit his lying. Remember that complete fabrication about meeting "<a href="https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/article-we-have-questions-about-pierre-poilievres-passport-story/" rel="nofollow">Mustafa from Calgary</a>" at the Ottawa airport? No, i suspect that PP won't submit to the top-secret vetting process because there's a good chance he'd fail. Here's the thing though, PP was vetted as a cabinet minister, but that was when he was single. There's a reason he suddenly dropped out of the Con leadership race last time citing family commitments. But none of the media outlets are willing ask him about it, let alone dig into his wife's background. They'd be crucified by Cons shrieking that wives are off limits. But a potential PM who won't submit to security screening is a huge red flag that the corporate media should be reporting, but isn't. This is journalistic malpractice. Capnoreply@blogger.com