PIERRE POILIEVRE IS NOT A SERIOUS PERSON.
— AMC 🇨🇦 (@AMCinHogtown) October 16, 2024
Watch and listen (clip from the PM's testimony at the Public Inquiry into Foreign Interference – October 16, 2024 ~11:50am). pic.twitter.com/oRFtwpf7HK
Trudeau calls it “bewildering” and “inexplicable” that Pierre Poilievre will not get the necessary top secret clearance to protect the integrity of the Conservative Party of Canada.
— Judy Trinh (@judyatrinh) October 16, 2024
Also an excellent summary tonight from Wesley Wark A National Security PM? One more word on the PM’s testimony before PIFITwo former CSIS directors have just said that there isn’t a justification for briefing Poilievre’s chief of staff when Poilievre himself won’t get the clearance. #PnPCBC
— Dale Smith (@journo_dale) October 16, 2024
...He was forthright in stating that he was astonished to learn, for the first time through CSIS evidence presented to the Inquiry, about a liberal Parliamentarian who had been targeted by FI. He said he should have been alerted but also claimed that the changes that have made to the dissemination of intelligence would guarantee that if these events had happened in the present he would have been informed.But then the PM turned to how best to ensure that all political parties were aware of foreign interference. He expressed some reservations about a policy of briefing Parliamentarians using intelligence information. But he extolled the value of bringing all opposition party leaders into the secret tent so that they could be made aware of intelligence on foreign interference threats targeting Canadians and their parties. This requires opposition leaders to be security cleared to a high level so that they can receive classified briefings. Jagmeet Singh for the NDP and Elizabeth May for the Greens have taken this step. Yves-Francois Blanchet for the Bloc said he would, but appears not to have followed through. The PM said he regarded this approach as non-partisan in nature. Knowledge raises all boats.But then the PM went on to unleash a fierce attack on the Conservative Party leader, Pierre Poilievre, for his refusal to obtain a security clearance. He called this decision by Poilievre “bewildering,” “lacking in common sense,” and “irresponsible.” He stated later in cross-examination that Poilievre lacked seriousness about national security and appeared unconcerned that his own leadership race may have been impacted by foreign interference. There was a to and fro with the counsel for the Conservative Party on this. It got juicy. I think Trudeau won that one on points.This was both an electioneering moment and a legacy moment. The PM positioning himself as best placed to defend the country’s national security and deliver policies and actions in the national interest. ...
Okay, let me get this straight.
— Charlie Angus (@CharlieAngusNDP) October 16, 2024
Pierre Poilievre is demanding Trudeau tell him what Poilievre doesn't want to find out for himself.
Stornoway Boy is not cut out for the big time. https://t.co/QBgy0NVhyZ
🚨BREAKING: “Poilievre's decision not to go through security screening means that no one in the party is in a position to act on the intelligence or challenge its accuracy, said Trudeau.” #PierrePoilievreMustResign https://t.co/zZHPUAEZza pic.twitter.com/5fUKcrO6GG
— Carleton Deserves Better (@Carleton4Change) October 16, 2024
Everything in Trudeau’s testimony has been cosigned by the FBI, MI6, France, Aus.
— Dean Blundell🇨🇦 (@ItsDeanBlundell) October 16, 2024
There is no way out of this for Pierre Poilievre. No way.
And he hasn’t said a fucking word. https://t.co/oLKJ13tyKd
"They didn't like, mention me or anything did they?" whispers Poilievre to Singh after classified India briefing
— The Beaverton (@TheBeaverton) October 16, 2024
And in today's other big story, Harris triumphed on Fox News tonight -- personable, tough, principled and clear:I think this is defcon pronouns.
— (Mx) Brigitte Pellerin, they | them | iel 🏳️🌈 (@bpellerin) October 16, 2024
My take: Bret Baier has rarely looked as bad (or tendentious) as he did in his interview with Kamala Harris. On the flip side, this was one of her best interviews. She dominated Bret. All in all it was quite a bad day for MAGA world's most important media outlet. https://t.co/kNGR8Parov
— Peter Wehner (@Peter_Wehner) October 17, 2024
I'd like to congratulate Kamala Harris on her victory in the Presidential Debate against Bret Baier despite Baier's compulsive interruptions
— Keith Olbermann (@KeithOlbermann) October 16, 2024
Vice President Harris refused to let Bret Baier talk over her and her salient presentation of the facts and her vision for the country. She refused to yield to bad faith framing or downplaying Trump as an existential threat to our democracy. She was exceptional in that interview.
— Charlotte Clymer 🇺🇦 (@cmclymer) October 16, 2024
BREAKING: Bret Baier is refusing to do a second debate with Kamala Harris after getting his ass handed to him.
— Alex Cole (@acnewsitics) October 16, 2024
1 comment:
Regarding PP's refusal to attain Federal Security clearance: I went through and attained Federal clearance 24 years ago up to my retirement being part of my job was to access a GoC building. My clearance was at the level below the level our government and party leaders require and the one PP is refusing to attain. The one issue the Feds are most concerned with is one's personal finances. If the person applying has considerable debt, they are unlikely to receive clearance due to the fact that parties wishing to get information from the GoC operations might bribe the person with clearance and debt. To me that means Poilievre doesn't't want to disclose how he got his wealth on an MP's/Cabinet Minister's salary. He is definitely hiding from us how he became a multi millionaire and I suspect, who is propping him up.
mr perfect
Post a Comment