Of course, Reid had to withdraw his tweet -- he "didn't realize" he had been suckered by a doctored Trudeau video.Angus Reid reposts a doctored video that misquotes the PM as if it's reality and we're supposed to accept his company's poll results are believable? I have a bridge to sell you if you believe a single thing that company puts out in future. pic.twitter.com/BLh6wn16bw
— Jean (@CdnJean) October 5, 2024
And of course, in his supposed "apology" tweet he managed to be offensive AGAIN:Here's the FULL clip of Prime Minister #JustinTrudeau's comments on Mosque vandalization and the burning down of a Catholic church.
— Jason Pugh π¨π¦ π³️π (@TheJasonPugh) October 5, 2024
I don't expect any better from @AmazingZolton. But @AngusReid? Do better.
This is pure Con mis/disinformation propaganda. #cdnpoli #cdnmedia pic.twitter.com/Mmk9YqkZdJ
He didn't address his apparent support of residential school denialism.My tweet on church burnings & the PM response stirred up a lot from Cons and Truanons. I didn’t realize I was tweeting doctored images. Deleted. The burnings are a big issue. On Trudeau - let’s see what CNDs have to say in ‘25. Unlike the video our elections aren’t doctored.
— Angus Reid (@AngusReid) October 6, 2024
Angus Reid calling us TruAnon says everything about the bias of his polling.
— π¨π¦ The Tao of Woke Steve πΊπ¦ π· (@ou812_Kess) October 6, 2024
Russia approves. π
Angus Reid did more to discredit pollsters over the last few days than almost anything that I can think of. He is obviously too tone deaf to understand the damage that he has done to his profession, and pollsters everywhere. Imagine shitting all over your legacy to own liberals. pic.twitter.com/Gwp6cSBSn0
— Neil Before Zod™ (@WaytowichNeil) October 6, 2024
When I see tweets like Reid’s and then see Coletto/Abacus speaking at a Manning Centre conference, I question how their bias doesn’t come into play. If neither has enough common sense to know how it affects their reputations then it’s fair to question how they run their polling.
— Ltmbf π©π»π¨ π¨π¦ (@Loritmbf) October 6, 2024
I know he is a colleague but far more egregious is his obvious hatred of PM to promote a doctored tweet and his obvious support of those who deny deaths occurred at Residential schools. His arrogance beggars belief. Of course this affects his brand.
— Cynthiaπ€π¨π¦π΄σ §σ ’σ ³σ £σ ΄σ Ώππ²πΊπ¦ (@Tintie4) October 6, 2024
AR was always a CON.
— Jeffrey1 (@JeffreyBrooks49) October 6, 2024
Remember how biased AR President Shachi Kurl was during the leaders' debate she moderated? After spewing nonsense for maybe a minute, she barked at PM Justin Trudeau: Mr Trudeau you have 10 seconds to respond. Nuts. But hey nobody cares.
Nuremberg 2.0 advocates typically call for those who created, justified or enforced public health measures — including politicians, doctors, academics, journalists and police — to be jailed and even executed for “crimes against humanity.”
So on Sunday, Press Progress released a major story that BC Conservative leader John Rustad had talked to an interviewer in July about supporting Nuremberg 2.0:Winter is coming, Bruce ✌️ https://t.co/T2nNDkJyCB pic.twitter.com/yCcfNOUiMs
— Jodi Bruhn (@stratejuste) October 7, 2024
A vote for John Rustad's conservative party is akin to confessing you are π¦π©π
— timethief π¨π¦ progressive centrist feminist (@timethief) October 7, 2024
Rustad later - hours later - issued a statement saying he had misunderstood the interviewer's question.I can’t emphasize enough how legitimately dangerous it is for @JohnRustad4BC to be encouraging the #Nuremberg2 lunatics.
— Diamond Jim Lowe (Parody. Maybe.) (@DiamondJimLowe) October 7, 2024
These Shitbirds want people executed for making them wear masks in Costco. https://t.co/95vzWBVlkD
Yeah, sure ...Antivaxers and the Conservatives are an interesting match. Tell me that’s not weird.
— Allan (@allan_pollock) October 7, 2024
4 comments:
Thanks for posting about the brouhaha. I rarely go to Twitter anymore as it's full of garbage. One aspect of the BC election I'd love to share (besides learning about the Nuremberg 2.0 incident by the Con leader) is my thought that the Conservatives all want to eliminate the carbon pricing without realizing that the oil & gas companies will fully raise the prices at the pump to occupy that vacated tax space. And there will be no rebates nor any progress on the climate crisis.
Sorry I didn't mean for that comment above to be anonymous. I stand by my words.
Thanks, good point!
'lil pp "cancel the checks" (carbon) "kill the pills" (pharma care) "pull the teeth" (dental care) "pare the care" (daycare/women's health) and axe all other social spending "it's just common sense"
The Nuremberg thing fits his anti-woke, freedumb , pro convoy profile and his dehumanizing style. 135+ motions of non confidence? pp works for himself when he was elected to work for Canadians.
Post a Comment