View on Threads
Some good lines here from Mulcair:
"Do not go gentle into that good night. Blog, blog against the dying of the light"
Canada isn't fooled:youtube.com/shorts/zYk2F... What he said ππ☮️π¨π¦π―
— This Canadian π¨π¦π― (@adeighton.bsky.social) June 11, 2026 at 7:16 PM
[image or embed]
As the CUSMA talks veer toward failure, we are reminded July 1 is not a cliff. Minister Leblanc is right. July 1 is a glide path to a restored Canadian sovereignty. By failing to trigger a renewal, the current talks will result in a countdown to July 1, 2036 when CUSMA will cease to exist entirely. That gives us - at most - ten years to land somewhere that Canada can be as free, as prosperous and as powerful as possible. We share a continent an authoritarian and predatory nation, and that won’t change anytime soon. I’ve written elsewhere about how CUSMA is a Dead Man Walking. Without a functioning dispute settlement mechanism, it is not free trade. The June 10 statement by President Trump just reminds us the U.S. does not accept us as sovereign equals. He wants us to submit to U.S. dominance, and of course we will never accept this. Of course, the glide path to Canadian sovereignty will be bumpy. We’ll have to deal with gusts of U.S. tariffs as they blow here and there. We’ll have to manage panicky passengers, as some stakeholders weigh their specific interests in a deal with the national interest in sovereign equality. And we will have legitimate debates about the destination we should glide towards. Where do we want to land? Who do we partner with to present the largest possible market of a free and open exchange in goods and services? How do we make sure trade and investment actually brings wealth to Canada and Canadians? How do we structure our economic relationships on a way that reinforces our security and our freedom rather than compete with them? We may have much less than ten years if the wreckage of CUSMA is swept away through an invocation of the six-month termination clause. Whether we discard the scrap metal of CUSMA now or in 2036, it’s important that we not get distracted from the real work. We should continue to negotiate with the U.S., to mitigate the brunt of their attacks. But while we protect our flanks let’s focus our principal energy on guiding our nation’s flight to its new destination. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H6yzvz6unV8
- Canadian Sovereignty
Read on SubstackCast of LaocoΓΆn and his Sons (Roman version of a lost Greek original), 100BC-50AD
— ArtButMakeItSports (@artbutmakeitsports.bsky.social) June 10, 2026 at 9:51 PM
[image or embed]
... I am determined to prove a villain
And hate the idle pleasures of these days.
Plots have I laid, inductions dangerous,
By drunken prophecies, libels and dreams...
I like Thomas Lukaszuk’s “Forever Canadian Unity Bus” tour of Alberta, as it mostly runs on heart. That one red-and-white RV could be called the official vehicle of the “Stay Side” who will vote in the province-wide October 19 referendum on whether Albertans wish to stay in Canada or not.The whole article is worth reading.
The bright red-and-white maple leaf wrap of the Unity Bus is loveable because it is so unlikely a sight in Alberta. In a land that prefers not to think of national patriotism, thank you very much, the Lakaszuk Forever Canadian Unity Bus does so unabashedly.
Lukaszuk, a former deputy premier of Alberta, posted this on social media: “My strategy for separatism is the same as my strategy for pierogies; stab it with a fork, deal with it directly, and don’t leave any leftovers.”....
I made $5,000 in one month on Substack. Here's how: I found a niche for my newsletter. I posted every day. I created a value proposition, offering premium content to a focused audience. I sold my 2003 Toyota Corolla.
- Archer Parquette
Read on SubstackThere’s a new story making the rounds in Ottawa, and it picks up neatly where an older one left off: apparently, Mark Carney likes to yell at annoying, incompetent politicians.
He must be going hoarse on the Liberal benches...
...The more progressive Liberals complain that he’s too managerial, too pro-growth, too friendly to energy, too dismissive of caucus feeling, the more he looks like someone separate from the very Liberal brand Canadians had grown sick of. The more MPs leak that he’s harsh behind closed doors, the more he looks like a man trying to drag an entitled caucus back to work. The more they warn that he isn’t a real Liberal, the more many voters may think: good.
That’s the irony. Carney’s distance from the Liberal Party may be one of his strongest political assets.
The Liberal brand was badly damaged before he took over. Canadians were tired of the lectures, the scandals, the identity games, the broken systems, and the sense that the country was being governed by people who were always performing virtue while avoiding accountability. Carney gives voters a way to keep the Conservatives out without having to pretend they still admire Trudeau-era Liberalism. He’s a permission structure for exhausted Liberal voters, soft Conservatives, centrists, and institutional Canadians who wanted a change without wanting Pierre Poilievre.
So when Liberal MPs complain that Carney doesn’t treat them with enough deference, they’re misunderstanding the transaction. Carney’s appeal isn’t that he restores the Liberal Party to its old self. His appeal is that he appears willing to discipline, ignore, or override that old self.
That leaves the caucus trapped.
They can’t easily remove him, because he saved them. They can’t easily defy him, because he has numbers. They can’t easily embarrass him, because their own public reputation is worse than his. They can’t credibly present themselves as guardians of democratic accountability after years of swallowing every Trudeau excess. And they can’t appeal to voters by saying, in effect, “please help, the prime minister we backed for power now has too much of it.”
No one is coming to help them.
Carney owns them. Not emotionally, maybe not even ideologically, but structurally. He has the office. He has the majority. He has the polling. He has the floor-crossers. He has the ability to replace troublemakers with new loyalists. Most importantly, he has the one thing caucus MPs usually respect more than principle: the appearance of being able to win.
That’s why the leaks are a bluff. They’re not a rebellion. They’re a flare shot into the sky by people who’ve realized the ship captain isn’t taking orders from them.
And if they keep pushing it, they may find the public reaction colder than they expect...
....Over the next five years, this strategy will introduce new legislation, investments, and programs that ensure AI is adopted responsibly, in a way that truly serves all Canadians – building trust, expanding opportunities, and reinforcing control of our sovereignty.The CBC Power and Politics panel talked about it on Thursday:
The AI for All Strategy targets an additional $200 billion of economic growth to create 250,000 new AI-related jobs over the next five years and to increase AI adoption from just over 12% to 60% by 2034. The strategy will provide up to 90,000 AI-related jobs and work placement opportunities for young Canadians and make our industries more competitive in the global economy.
Canadians must have confidence that AI is being developed and deployed safely, transparently, and in ways that reflect our values....
...Over the course of several caucus meetings now, [gift link] Grit MPs report Carney lashing out at certain members when he doesn’t like the message they deliver. They include Nova Scotia MP Jaime Battiste, a Mi’kmaw from Cape Breton, raising concerns over negative perceptions of the government’s changes to the Indian Act and receiving a stunning rebuke; Winnipeg MP Doug Eyolfson, a physician, being told not to come to the prime minister with his concerns over the lack of federal response to Alberta’s two-tiered health care Bill 11; and Laval MP Angelo Iacono, who wanted the prime minister to visit his riding and was met with Carney insisting he’d been to Laval recently, though he had not. The experiences have left a lasting imprint on several MPs.IDK, but it wasn't surprising to me that Carney would be impatient if he hears complaints instead of solutions.
“He yells,” said one MP who, like others, spoke on condition of anonymity to avoid retribution from the Prime Minister’s Office. “He punches down at caucus all the time.”
Carney has told his caucus members he doesn’t want to hear their concerns, he wants solutions. While it’s a message that resonates with some, hearing complaints can be useful....
Last week, some MPs felt the prime minister’s message was that he’s not interested in what they have to say.
Carney was making the case that the government is focused on national unity, on the CUSMA talks, on growing the economy; it has a plan, and message discipline is key. “If you don’t agree with our agenda, I don’t want to hear it. If you have criticism, keep them for yourself,” was the way another MP portrayed it....
....prime minister Mark Carney has been wholly silent on it since the data were released on Friday morning. He made two separate media appearances yesterday but took no questions at either one, and he has avoided Question Period yesterday and he’s avoiding it today, and it really starts to look like he’s ceding the ground to Poilievre, who keeps bellowing his ridiculous narratives while Carney, who is supposed to have the economic gravitas as a former central bank governor, remains absent. And there are important things we should probably be talking about with this data, such as the fact that in periods of slow growth, these indicators dipping below zero are less important than the overall picture, and that overreacting and panicking can lead to greater problems or damage in the longer term. But we’re not having this conversation because, again, Carney is ceding the field, and given that Poilievre seems to enjoy this unearned economic credibility, it’s frankly arrogant to think that his bogus narratives can’t gain traction because they absolutely can, and that will spell trouble overall.
View on Threads
Posthaste: Recession, what recession? Canada's economy is doing better than it has in years by this measureSo naturally, Poilievre is in a panic. And I guess he thinks Canadians are stupid and easily bamboozled, doesn't he.
GDP per person is once again on the rise
Canadian economic data made international news Friday as the latest reading of gross domestic product earned mentions from everyone from investing guru Mohamed El-Erian to the Wall Street Journal.
Canada’s GDP doesn’t often attract such attention, but this time a second quarter of contraction raised the red flag of “technical recession.”
Conservative leader Pierre Poilievre seized on the data, accusing Prime Minister Mark Carney of being the only G7 leader to send his country’s economy into recession and calling for an emergency debate.
The numbers were certainly a surprise. The 0.1 per cent decline in GDP in the first quarter shocked observers who had been expecting growth closer to 2 per cent. ‘Historically unusual,” is how Nathan Janzen, assistant chief economist at the Royal Bank of Canada, described it.
Luckily, economists say there is more to a recession than just two quarters of negative growth — namely the 3 Ds — depth, duration and dispersion.
This decline is not even close on depth — amounting to just 0.6 per cent annualized over the two quarters, “barely a scratch in GDP terms,” said Robert Kavcic, senior economist at BMO Capital Markets in a note.
In the past three Canadians recessions, outside the pandemic, the average decline at the weakest point was 5.3 per cent.
Nor is weakness widespread across the economy. The trade war has hit manufacturing, trade and real estate hard, but other sectors like finance, resources and health care are growing, said Kavcic.
Though exports are down, domestic demand has been climbing, and consumer spending has continued to rise.
Duration, he concedes, is getting close. The Canadian economy has been soft since the start of the trade war in early 2025, posting three negative quarters out of four.
However, there is one key variable in this equation that should not be overlooked and when viewed through its lens paints a very different picture of Canada’s economy, say economists — population.
Since the federal government cracked down on immigration after the post-pandemic boom, population has actually declined in Canada over the past two quarters.
So while the overall GDP reading is slipping, GDP per person is on the rise, a welcome change from a few years back when the per capita measure was nose-diving....
Q: Polls show that despite the bleak picture that you're painting, Canadians trust Mark Carney to deal with the economy. Why do you think that despite what you're saying, your pitch is not resonating with them? Pierre Poilievre: THE ILLUSION
- Scott Robertson
Read on SubstackView on Threads
View on Threads
View on Threads
View on Threads
Impressive speech by PM Carney π¨π¦ https://youtu.be/-Wa2kZIV26s?si=eYDIlUzrtu3jOT5h
- Kier Atkinson π¨π¦
Read on Substack#Habs Lane Hutson: "it seemed like the only guy who showed up was Doby [Jakub DobeΕ‘]. We were just not good enough, didn't answer the bell. The good news is we get another chance to answer the bell."
— Priyanta Emrith (@habsinhighheels.bsky.social) May 27, 2026 at 9:09 PM
View on Threads