The video is as plain as plain can be -- the undercover police were pretending to be anarchists and were carrying rocks to the front of the protest line. The middle-aged unionists and the mothers and the teenagers and the grandmothers were not carrying rocks. The police-anarchists refused to drop their rocks and move away in spite of Dave Coles yelling repeatedly at them, "This is our line!"
But now a Quebec police inspector says this:
"One of the extremists gave the rock to one of our police officers and he had a choice to make," Savard said.No, he was refusing to DROP it, not to throw it. And its pretty obvious to just about everybody. Take a look at some of the 170 comments following this CBC news story:
"He was asked by extremists to throw the rock at the police, but never had any intention of using it."
Why the rocks? Why the face masks? Why the fake arrest? Why the initial denial?Now our very own fool, Stockwell Day, has rushed in where angels fear to tread:
The official statements are some of the most clownish spin I've seen anywhere.
To the police. We, the public, for the most part accept that you must use deception in your fight against criminals. But this was deception against the very people you are supposedly sworn to protect, in this case, members of the public exercising their rights of free speech and public protest. I've joined a protest rally only once in my life, but your behaviour here is going to get me, and I guess a whole lot of grey-hairs like me, rethinking my complacency.
I'm afraid it's pretty clear what the officers intentions were. They were not there to keep the peace.
The video makes it EXTREMELY obvious that the union leaders were the ones to try to keep the peace in their ranks, and the three undercover agents were the ones trying to have the protest break out in violence.
This makes me wonder how much of the supposed "violence" attributes to protesters was incited by the police and right wing politicians.
"The thing that was interesting in this particular incident, three people in question were spotted by protesters because were not engaging in violence," Day said.As Dawg asks, Is he out of his mind? This isn't what happened at all -- what video Day was watching anyway? Maybe he had another Niagara Falls moment and started thinking that the man in the suit was the undercover cop while the guys in the masks were the protesters.
"They were being encouraged to throw rocks and they were not throwing rocks, it was the protesters who were throwing the rocks. That's the irony of this," Day said.
Day added the actions were substantiated by the video that he has seen of the protests.
"Because they were not engaging in violence, it was noted that they were probably not protesters. I think that's a bit of an indictment against the violent protesters," Day said.
I agree with Big City Lib:
. . . as a partisan Liberal I can only praise Allah that Public Security Minister Stockwell Day was kind enough to repeat this nonsense, thus dragging that Federal Conservatives right into the heart of the cover-up.Oh, wait -- maybe THIS was the video that Day watched: