Thursday, November 28, 2024

Today in The Stupid: Canada v. Trump

Canada got to see its premiers in action yesterday, facing the first of the many existential crises that will define the Trump Administration, and it wasn't a pretty sight. 

Dale Smith / Routine Proceedings
Roundup: The virtual meeting with the premiers over Trump
...Jagmeet Singh is panicking and demanding performative forcefulness, while Pierre Poilievre is trying to leverage the moment for his own political ends, claiming that the solution is to do everything he says (conveniently!). Premiers have been all over the map, going from caution to outright boot-licking (looking at you, Danielle Smith), and this was one of the messages that emerged from that meeting. I also find it particularly crass the number of premiers who set up American flags for their backdrops before their media availabilities before and after the meeting. Seriously, guys?
Chrystia Freeland met with reporters and spoke about the need for a united front and not to be seen to be squabbling with one another, but premiers with their own agendas haven’t really seemed to warm to that necessity, because they’d rather score points against the current government with boneheaded accusations that they were “blindsided” by the threats, and that they don’t have a plan. (They’ve had a plan for over a year, guys. You might want to actually pay attention). And after the meeting, most of the premiers made their own individual points about how they want so many more resources poured into their province (such as more RCMP members that don’t exist because they can’t recruit and train them fast enough, or retain them in the toxic culture of the Force), but Smith remains particularly stubborn in trying to leverage this into foregoing the emissions cap and trying to say that Trudeau shouldn’t be leading the effort to defend Canada (again, to her benefit).
... Trudeau has talked about strengthening border measures, which has been an ongoing process, particularly since the amendment of the Safe Third Country Agreement, so maybe that too [as with Mexico] will be enough to get Trump to declare victory? I guess we shall see, but in the meantime, we’ll see how many premiers can keep their cool.
Well, here they are, bowing and scraping:

“I pledge allegiance to the Flag of the United States of America, and to the Republic for which it stands, one nation under God…” ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ๐Ÿซก

[image or embed]

— Luke LeBrun (@lukelebrun.ca) November 27, 2024 at 9:55 PM

Greatest line in television history

"As God is my witness, I thought turkeys could fly"

Tuesday, November 26, 2024

America's attention-junkie shoots himself in the foot


President-elect Donald Trump on Monday promised massive hikes in tariffs on goods coming from Mexico, Canada and China starting on the first day of his administration, a policy that could sharply increase costs for American businesses and consumers. 
The move, Trump said, will be in retaliation for illegal immigration and “crime and drugs” coming across the border.... 
"Measures proposed this evening could hit a number of strategic US industrial sectors hard, add approximately $272 billion a year to tax burdens, raise goods prices, lift interest rates, and sap strength in an already-vulnerable household sector,” said Karl Schamotta, chief market strategist at Corpay Cross-Border Solutions. 
 After the announcement, the Canadian dollar fell 1.2% against the US dollar, and the Mexican peso fell 2% against the dollar. China’s yuan, though controlled by the government, traded higher – above 7.6% – in offshore markets. 
 Although investors believed the tariffs could ultimately strengthen the dollar, America’s financial markets took a hit, too. 
The extraordinary tariffs would raise costs dramatically for Americans for everyday goods that had previously come over the border without any import taxes. 
That stunning shift could stymie economic growth, especially if inflation-weary consumers spend less in the face of higher costs. 
US stock futures, which were higher before Trump’s announcement, fell somewhat – Dow futures were down 160 points, or 0.3%. Nasdaq futures were 0.4% lower, and the broader S&P 500 was also down 0.4%. US Treasury bond prices fell. 

I really never realized the solution to all our problems was a trade war with Canada.

— Ron Filipkowski (@ronfilipkowski.bsky.social) November 25, 2024 at 9:44 PM
Personally, I think Trump just wanted to draw attention to himself yesterday because Biden is about to succeed in brokering a peace deal between Israel and Lebanon, and Attention Must Be Paid Only To The Orange One!

It’s a mistake to ask this question because it assumes Trump’s rationality. He wants to do this because it makes him feel powerful. He doesn’t care if the effects are good or bad. Indeed, the more destruction he causes, or the more people fear destruction he may cause, the more powerful he feels.

[image or embed]

— George Conway (@gtconway.bsky.social) November 26, 2024 at 7:04 AM

Monday, November 25, 2024

It's always something. If it's not one thing, it's another.


So how come Canada is hosting nine Taylor Swift concerts?  
Because when Trudeau invites you, you come:
So Swift set up multiple concerts in Toronto and Vancouver!
But of course Trudeau can't ever be given any credit for doing anything as remarkable as this. 
So cue the hysterical shitposting about Trudeau going with his family to one of the Taylor Swift concerts on the same night there was an anti-NATO protest riot happening in Montreal
Because you know these Poilievre Conservatives -- they're the Roseanne Roseannadanna of Canada - It's always something, if it's not one thing its another.

Saturday, November 23, 2024

Funny stuff and animal crackers


This was the very first strip in Calvin and Hobbes, on Nov. 18, 1985 - all in all, I think Calvin and Hobbes was the world's best comic strip. 

Moving on, some comments about the current scene:

I never wanted to live in interesting times.

— Molly Jong-Fast (@mollyjongfast.bsky.social) November 10, 2024 at 8:35 PM

Many people think that as you get older, you care less about politics. But it’s not true. You start thinking a lot more about the kind of world you want to leave behind. You want it to be better than the one you were born into. We all have a personal legacy in mind. Mine is to outlive Trumpism.

— George Takei (@georgetakei.bsky.social) November 15, 2024 at 10:51 AM

Friday, November 22, 2024

Ain't he having some fun now!


Thanks, Justin!
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau announced Thursday a suite of new measures meant to alleviate some of the affordability pressures people have been experiencing in the post-COVID era — including a two-month GST holiday on some goods and services.
The Liberal government will also send $250 cheques to the 18.7 million people in Canada who worked in 2023 and earned $150,000 or less.
Those cheques, which the government is calling the "Working Canadians Rebate," will arrive sometime in "early spring 2025," Trudeau said.
The GST/HST holiday will start on Dec. 14 and run through Feb. 15, 2025.
People will be able to buy the following goods GST-free:
-Prepared foods, including vegetable trays, pre-made meals and salads, and sandwiches.
-Restaurant meals, whether dine-in, takeout or delivery.
-Snacks, including chips, candy and granola bars.
-Beer, wine, cider and pre-mixed alcoholic beverages below 7 per cent alcohol by volume (ABV).
-Children's clothing and footwear, car seats and diapers.
-Children's toys, such as board games, dolls and video game consoles.
-Books, print newspapers and puzzles for all ages.
-Christmas trees.
With these exemptions, all food in Canada will be essentially tax-free.
"For two months, Canadians are going to get a real break on everything they do," Trudeau said at a media event in Newmarket, Ont.
"Our government can't set prices at the checkout but we can put more money in peoples' pockets. That's going to give people the relief they need. People are squeezed and we're there to help."
Here's the "serious" explanation: And here's something worth noting: And here's a good interview:

A good interview that clarifies Canada's carbon tax. www.cp24.com/video/2024/1... #climatechange #trudeau #carbontax

[image or embed]

— Al Czarnecki (@alczarnecki.bsky.social) November 21, 2024 at 11:05 PM
And here's the "funny" explanation:

Wednesday, November 20, 2024

Today's News: Calling out Dear Leader


CBC calls out the Conservatives version of "freedom":

Christian Noel / CBC
Poilievre's office maintains tight control over what Conservative MPs say and do
Party staffers monitor caucus for signs of message indiscipline and fraternization with other MPs
After two years of Pierre Poilievre as their leader, many Conservative MPs say they are much less free now than they were before his arrival.
The man who promised during his leadership run to make Canada "the freest country in the world" maintains tight control over the actions of his caucus members.
Normally loquacious Conservatives close up like oysters and dare not speak without their leader's approval. MPs are watched by Conservative staffers both inside and outside Parliament. Elected representatives are publicly called to order for deviating from the party line.
Conservative MPs' words and actions are closely scrutinized by the leader's office. Partisanship is encouraged. Fraternizing with elected officials from other parties is a no-no.
Those who follow these rules are rewarded. Those who don't often have to suffer consequences.
"There are always multiple people in the penalty box, there is always someone in trouble," one caucus member said.
"You don't need to be told what to do. You watch the leader and understand what's expected from you," one Conservative source said.
The further you get into this article, the creepier it gets:
"You are celebrated in front of the entire caucus for being a good cheerleader. And you get more speaking time in the House and during question period."
Those who refuse to parrot the lines lose their speaking time, another source added.
It's radio silence at the entrance to Conservative caucus meetings these days. Every Wednesday morning, journalists throw questions at the arriving MPs. Almost all of them pass without answering; some avoid making eye contact with journalists.
... Conservative Party staffers keep a close eye on MPs' activities — who's talking to reporters, who's deviating from the party line, who's fraternizing with MPs from other parties. Journalists have spotted party staffers taking notes and sources say these activities are reported to the leader's office.
"Everybody is being watched. What we say, what we do, who we talk to. We're told not to fraternize with MPs from the other parties. And that's not normal," a Conservative source said.
...Conservative staffers monitor MPs' interactions not only in the Commons chamber but also in the corridors of Parliament and at social events such as the Press Gallery dinner and the Speaker's garden party.
Poilievre's press attachรฉ was even spotted jotting down the names of Conservative MPs attending the Press Gallery dinner this spring. It's an event that Poilievre — who has strained relations with the Parliamentary Press Gallery — and most of his MPs have avoided for the past two years.
"We don't get told not to go, but we can see that the leader doesn't go, so we do the same. Otherwise, it would be frowned upon," said one Conservative source.
...Poilievre imposes iron discipline on himself. He works hard. He works late.
"We've been telling him for months that he needs to take a vacation, but he just won't listen," one source said.
"He's the one who decides everything. His main adviser is himself … The people around him are only there to realize the leader's vision."
..."There's a very small circle around the leader. There's a lack of variety of opinion. That's our biggest challenge," said a Conservative source.
It will be Canada's challenge too, if Poilievre ever becomes PM. 

Tuesday, November 19, 2024

Today's Roundup: Trudeau, Stoehr, Fallows, Sullivan, Wellman, plus a few tweets/posts



Following up from my post last week, I have been seeing more commentary lately which discuss misinformation and disinformation as the main problem that progressives now have in getting their messages out to the public. Several of the items I found for this Roundup talk about this issue too.
But first, Canadians need to see much more of this, please:

Why Canada is changing its immigration system! PM Trudeau released a nearly seven-minute video on YouTube Sunday talking about the recent reduction in permanent residents being admitted to Canada and changes to the temporary foreign worker program. youtube.com/watch?v=vOB7...

[image or embed]

— JaroGiesbrecht (@jarogiesbrecht.bsky.social) November 17, 2024 at 4:31 PM
Shorter:

Sunday, November 17, 2024

Today's News: Does Poilievre think he can bring a knife to a gun fight?


So Poilievre thinks bluster and combativeness will intimidate Trump? 
Or is he just trying to impress Canadians by boasting about what a great fighter he would be for the Canadian economy - you know, the economy he has been calling a disaster for the last year.
But his threat to "fight fire with fire" is a hollow one, it isn't going to impress Americans much -- it will, in fact, likely end up making it harder on Canadian industries trying to survive the Trump Apocalypse. 
I suspect Ford has already been on the phone to PP to tell him to stop.

"Poilievre said he'd end those duties but wouldn’t say how." The usual crap from PP - make promises but never explain how. The man who runs away from reporters asking tough questions now vows to stand up to Trump & “fight fire with fire”. Anybody buying that? globalnews.ca/news/1087240...

[image or embed]

— CdnJean (@cdnjean.bsky.social) November 15, 2024 at 8:39 PM
Trudeau and the federal Liberals are already fighting hard for Canada -- not with bombast but with strategy
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says talks at the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation summit in Peru have been dominated by worries about how to navigate Donald Trump's return to the White House...
Trudeau is one of few world leaders who was also in power during Trump's first administration, and he says his message to his colleagues is to emphasize the "win-wins" of trade deals....
Trudeau also says Trump asked him specifically about Canada's approach to trading with China when the pair spoke last week, and says he highlighted new tariffs on Chinese goods.
And when Trudeau phoned his congratulations to Trump, he kept the tone warm and friendly, not combative:
Trudeau told Trump how his father had been defeated in an election before winning one shortly after — an anecdote to which Trump responded positively.

Saturday, November 16, 2024

Happening Now: a Liberal turn-around?


As Canada hunkers down to survive another Canadian winter, we may be starting to see some signs of a turn-around in Liberal fortunes. Liberals are trending a little higher in the polls:

(Support me by subscribing/donating) Federal Polling: CPC: 39% (+5) LPC: 29% (-5) NDP: 17% (-1) BQ: 7% (-1) GPC: 5% (+3) PPC: 3% (-2) Others: 2% EKOS / Nov 11, 2024 / n=1241 / MOE 2.8% / IVR (% Change With 2021 Federal Election) Check federal details on @338canada.bsky.social at: 338canada.com

[image or embed]

— Polling Canada (@canadianpolling.bsky.social) November 12, 2024 at 3:27 PM
Trudeau is able to remind Canadians now what a good job his government did in dealing with Trump 2016-2020, and would do again:

When I was researching my book on Trudeau, I was impressed by how broad the coalition was that helped Trudeau maintain our trade relationship with during Trump 1.0. 1/x

[image or embed]

— Stephen Maher (@stephenmaher.bsky.social) November 15, 2024 at 8:14 AM

Friday, November 15, 2024

Canada v. Trump: The "Revenge Tour" begins


Well, that didn't last long, did it? 
As much as I truly want to deny Trump any space in my head or in this blog, its just not going to be possible. 
I'm calling this presidency "Trump 2: The Revenge Tour" as his Cabinet appointments bring his priorities into focus, pointing toward some of the problems Canada will need to face during Trump's presidency: 
- how will we help thousands (or tens of thousands) of refugees escaping Trump's concentration camps? 
- how will we defend our resources of water, oil, and minerals from Trump's greedy grasp? 
- how will we support our industries to survive Trump's tariffs? 
- how can we avoid being sucked into Trump's wars? 

The CBC's weekly At Issue panel discussion last night discussed Trump. Naturally, Rosemary Barton trotted out the "well, we survived 2016 to 2020, didn't we" and Chantal Hebert shut that down right quick - she said there will not be any comparison between the path Canada was able to take in 2016 to slide through the first Trump administration, and the existential threat to the nation that we now will face with the second Trump administration. Specifically, the panel talked about the likely refugee crisis at the US border, but they didn't have any idea how Canada could or should handle it, except to agree that the "safe third country agreement" is now ludicrous. 

Thursday, November 14, 2024

Today's News: Learning from the American nightmare


If we are going to save liberalism in Canada -- the federal Liberals and maybe even Justin Trudeau also -- then we have to reach Canadians and tell them the story of what Liberalism is. 
The more we learn about what went wrong with the Harris campaign, the more people are realizing that the Democrats have abysmal communications -- yes, Harris is a black woman, a disadvantage hard to overcome in a racist and misogynistic society - but mainly the Democratic brain-trust running her campaign didn't seem to realize that too many Americans had heard four solid years of lies about awful Democrats and Biden-bashing from their media sources, and a few enthusiastic rallys on television were not going to reverse that perception.

Kamala Harris didn't campaign on pronouns or white privilege or defunding the police. So why does it feel like she did?

— DougJBalloon (@nytpitchbot.bsky.social) November 12, 2024 at 9:19 AM
 

Wednesday, November 13, 2024

Today's News: Canadafornia, and other ways to survive the Trumpocalypse


As we watch the United States take a right turn and go sailing off the Trump cliff, I have been looking for articles and tweet threads that give advice on what for God's sake we can do about it. 
Here's the initial batch that I found: 

First of all, there might be something to this plan:

I could live there if Mr. Trudeau would rescue us.

[image or embed]

— segsig.bsky.social (@segsig.bsky.social) November 12, 2024 at 9:59 PM
And here are some other, mostly serious, ideas for surviving Trump.

Tuesday, November 12, 2024

Stories from the Internet: Two Horses' Asses

"Stories from the Internet" is an occasional series.
Here's a story I saw on Facebook: 

The US standard railroad gauge (distance between the rails) is 4 feet, 8.5 inches. That's an exceedingly odd number. Why was that gauge used? 
Well, because that's the way they built them in England, and English engineers designed the first US railroads. 
Why did the English build them like that? Because the first rail lines were built by the same people who built the wagon tramways, and that's the gauge they used. 
So, why did 'they' use that gauge then? Because the people who built the tramways used the same jigs and tools that they had used for building wagons, which used that same wheel spacing. 
Why did the wagons have that particular odd wheel spacing? Well, if they tried to use any other spacing, the wagon wheels would break more often on some of the old, long distance roads in England . You see, that's the spacing of the wheel ruts. 
So who built those old rutted roads? Imperial Rome built the first long distance roads in Europe (including England ) for their legions. Those roads have been used ever since. 
And what about the ruts in the roads? Roman war chariots formed the initial ruts, which everyone else had to match or run the risk of destroying their wagon wheels. Since the chariots were made for Imperial Rome , they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing. 
Therefore the United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet, 8.5 inches is derived from the original specifications for an Imperial Roman war chariot. 
Bureaucracies live forever. So the next time you are handed a specification/procedure/process and wonder 'What horse's ass came up with this?', you may be exactly right. Imperial Roman army chariots were made just wide enough to accommodate the rear ends of two war horses. (Two horses' asses.) 
Now, the twist to the story: When you see a Space Shuttle sitting on its launch pad, there are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main fuel tank. These are solid rocket boosters, or SRBs. The SRBs are made by Thiokol at their factory in Utah . The engineers who designed the SRBs would have preferred to make them a bit fatter, but the SRBs had to be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site. 
The railroad line from the factory happens to run through a tunnel in the mountains, and the SRBs had to fit through that tunnel. The tunnel is slightly wider than the railroad track, and the railroad track, as you now know, is about as wide as two horses' behinds. 
So, a major Space Shuttle design feature, of what is arguably the world's most advanced transportation system, was determined over two thousand years ago by the width of a horse's ass. 
And you thought being a horse's ass wasn't important? Ancient horse's asses control almost everything.

Monday, November 11, 2024

Today's News: Canada remembers.


The Taking of Vimy Ridge, Easter Monday 1917 by Richard Jack
...Supported by a creeping barrage, the Canadian Corps captured most of the ridge during the first day. The village of Thรฉlus fell during the second day, as did the crest of the ridge, once the Canadian Corps overran a salient against considerable German resistance. The final objective, a fortified knoll outside the village of Givenchy-en-Gohelle, fell to the Canadians on 12 April. The German 6th Army then retreated to the Oppy–Mรฉricourt line.
Historians attribute the success of the Canadian Corps to technical and tactical innovation, meticulous planning, powerful artillery support and extensive training, as well as the inability of the 6th Army to properly apply the new German defensive doctrine. The battle was the first occasion when the four divisions of the Canadian Expeditionary Force fought together and it was made a symbol of Canadian national achievement and sacrifice. ..
...By nightfall on 12 April 1917, the Canadian Corps was in firm control of the ridge, having suffered 10,602 casualties; 3,598 men had been killed and 7,004 wounded...