We went out for supper tonight (hooray!) so I didn't get a lot of reading done, but I do just have to share these hilarious stories:
Clown Shoes as metaphor
This week's dumbest story - the shoes! And this clowning is just so typical of the whole stupid Trump administration.
I love that Trump's toadies are wearing comically large shoes because the boss bought them and they're too chickenshit to mention that he guessed the wrong size.
Lori Idlout will cross the floor from the New Democratic Party to the Liberal Party of Canada, according to confirmation from the Liberal Party.
Idlout has represented Nunavut since being elected in 2021.
Her move adds to a growing list of MPs who have recently left their parties to join the Liberals. In total, three Conservative MPs and one NDP MP have now crossed the floor to the Liberals.
With three upcoming byelections scheduled for April, the floor crossing makes it increasingly likely that Mark Carney and the Liberals will secure a majority government in the House of Commons.
Idlout's statement is focused on Canadian political involvement and respect in the North:
Statement from new Liberal MP Lori Idlout, which was just released moments ago:
It is particularly apt that this happened tonight, I think, because once again today Trump called Carney "governor" - with a majority government, Carney can focus on his agenda to strengthen Canada and keep us out of Trump's clutches.
So the US and Israel have been at war with Iran for a week now. How's it going?
Well, first of all, they say history doesn't repeat itself but sometimes it rhymes. I'm hearing a rhyming now -- "hell no, we won't go" was what the young men of America told Johnson and Nixon about Vietnam.
Now Carney has found himself having to say again himself, repeatedly, Hell No We Won't Go - and Canadians have been saying that repeatedly to him, too:
CARNEY: "We have not received any request for such assistance [from Gulf states] ... We're not engaged in the conflict. We do not intend to engage. What we are doing is dealing with the consequences of the conflict … I don't necessarily anticipate those requests."
So yesterday in Australia, Carney seemed to say that he wasn't ruling out Canada military in the US/Israel war with Iran.
Everyone yesterday thought that was just a mistaken phrasing. Today I'm not so sure.
Here's what he said:
Speaking in Australia, Carney said he would “never categorically rule out” Canadian military involvement in defending allies from Iran, but added it’s distinct from offensive actions being taken by the US/Israel. “We will always stand by and defend our allies when called upon”
“There’s a distinction between the offensive actions that were taken, and are being taken, by the United States and Israel…We’re not party to those actions. But we will always defend Canadians. We will always stand by and defend our allies when called upon.” www.bloomberg.com/news/article...
...Prime Minister Mark Carney, very quickly out of the gate, endorsed this military action. Should he have?
This is a complicated question. I don’t say this as a value judgment, just as an empirical matter, but with the radicalism of the change in foreign policy that Carney has brought, Carney is the least Pearsonian prime minister in Canadian history. The Carney view is, while Canada spent much of its existence as a nation under the protection of the superpower of the day — first Great Britain, then the United States — under that protection, Canadians never had to worry much about their own security. That was somebody else’s job. So Canadian foreign policy could focus on values. Carney is now saying, Canada has lost its superpower protector, for the first time since 1867. And in that world, Canada must act in a much more cold-blooded and amoral way. And that’s why it must forgive India for committing assassinations on Canadian soil. It must forgive China for interfering in Canadian elections and brutalizing Chinese Canadians on Canadian soil. And it must accept the American intervention in Iran, because those are all things that are important to those much greater powers, and Canada needs to navigate between India, China, and the United States in a world in which Canadian security is much less secure than it ever has been before, and there’s no room in this complicated equation for Pearsonian talk. Canada is out of that business forever. That seems to be what he’s saying, and it’s very radical. Let’s pivot to what you see happening on Canadian-American relations. A lot of our politicians are trying very hard to influence this administration, everything from Premier Doug Ford’s commercials featuring former president Ronald Reagan, to Conservative MP Jamil Jivani visiting his old friend the vice-president JD Vance. Is there any evidence that any of that is working?
Well, the fact that it doesn’t work doesn’t mean you shouldn’t do it. Canadians are not wrong to use the tried-and-true methods first. Politics is extremely hard, and the fact that things don’t work doesn’t mean you are foolish to try them. It’s worth the effort. And it was also worth taking the measure of how much of Trump’s hostility to Canada was just bluster, and how much of it was settled implacable malice. I think it’s the latter. And it has taken time for Canadians to accept that that could be true, because it’s so different. It’s so shocking. Canada has a whole history that goes back to the meeting between Franklin Roosevelt and Mackenzie King at Ogdensburg (New York) in the ‘30s, where Roosevelt said an attack on Canadian territory will be (considered) an attack on the United States. It’s America’s first permanent security guarantee to any country. And now that logic has changed, and it’s hard to adjust. Many people up here wonder whether we should be expending so much effort on a renewed trade agreement with the U.S., because they fear even if he signs it, Trump won’t adhere to it anyway. What’s your view?
As scary and threatening as Trump is, he has one thing in common with every other previous president, which is, he starts with a bucket of minutes, and every day he spends the minutes, and they never return. And as you spend the minutes, the president almost always gets weaker. So, the longer Canada postpones agreements with Trump, the better Canada will do.
Now Carney is in Australia - here are some of the best interviews and speeches. First, that f-bomb -- which in the clips now is barely heard. Darn it!:
In which Mark Carney drops the F bomb while talking about having drank too much wine 😅
(they muted it out for youtube of course *eye roll* it was more of that whispered fuck as opposed to loud dropping it)
www.youtube.com/shorts/Z6vWP...
I like this statement considerably better than his first
https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/statements/2026/03/03/statement-prime-minister-carney-evolving-situation-middle-east
Now its Monday night, two days into the US/Israel War with Iran, and its quite clear that the United States doesn't know what it is doing, why it is doing it, or when it can ever stop.
Sunday and today, we saw absolute clown shows across the US government:
So far we’ve heard 12 different primary reasons for the war, 7 different main objectives, and 5 different exit strategies.
The glibness. The indifference. The carelessness. The utter lack of planning for a war against a country of 90M. The sickness of a man who acts on whim that will kill thousands not hundreds. The horror of a regime that enables this sickness. The broken body politic that votes in such malignancy.
Just the usual batch of funny stuff for this week - enjoy!
In happy political news, the Green Party unexpectedly but decisively won a byelection in northern England:
For Europeans looking in:
- The Greens are the only party in England advocating a new EU referendum.
- Pro brexit Labour lost.
- Pro brexit, anti ECHR and right wing Reform party lost.
This might be a big moment in Britain - turning away from the far right.
Now there is hope! It's no longer a choice between grim and grimmer. We can vote for who we want and win. Anywhere.
It's just one constituency, but the Green victory in Gorton and Denton is an electric shock to our political system.
Look at this fascinating map, showing the great variety and complexity of regional rug patterns in Iran -- how many centuries of organized culture does it take for a people to develop such a sophisticated, distinctive and unique art? Iran has been an organized country for 3,000 years, with a population of 93 million.
I think Trump and Hegseth and Vance and Rubio and Gabbard thought America could quickly bomb Iran into cowering submission. Because wasn't it easy to send a troop of soldiers into Venezuela to pick up Maduro and to order a few Navy ships to blockade Cuba.
But Iran has a military that can fight back.
So I expect this war will turn out to be just as inept, corrupt and half-assed as everything else Trump does.
So tonight I was reading some Rodger Sherman posts about sports - one of the American journalists I follow because of his wide sports knowledge - and his last Olympic newsletter was mentioned. People liked this part especially:
But you know, I just couldn't accept this statement.
The At Issue panel starts talking about it at the 8:20 mark:
TLDW -
Raj: "good speech, good politics...need to focus on the relationship but this too shall pass. We need to use our leverage... Mark Carney has failed to live up to his promises..."
Hebert: "a lot of Canadians have made up their minds about Poilievre... but its good news about not giving away the country. He's playing the long game, that I'm a serious person, going on trips outside the country..."
Coyne: "it depends on the follow-up...it was a change in tone, it was statesman-like after a week of demagoguery on the refugee file...more emphasis on getting successful trade negotiations...he's overestimating our trade advantages..."