As we watch the ICE Gestapo losing their minds in the US, I thought of these three photos that changed politics:
Alan Kurdi from Syria drowned on a Greek beach in 2015, along with his brother, when his family tried to escape Syria by boat. It turned out that the Harper government had refused to let his aunt in Canada take them in as refugees. Harper lost the Canadian election to Trudeau two months later.
Yanela Sanchez from Honduras arrived at the US border in 2018 with her mother after a month on the road and a trip by raft across the Rio Grande. They were immediately taken into custody. This photo of that poor crying exhausted baby became the face of Trump's cruel zero tolerance family separation policy. Trump lost the US election two years later.
Finally, this one: arriving home from pre-school on Tuesday, 5-year-old Liam Ramos from Ecuador was used as bait by the ICE Gestapo in Minnesota, so that his family would open their doors. Liam and his father were admitted to the US in 2024 as refugees but both were arrested on Tuesday, nobody knows why, and are now in ICE detention in Texas, nobody knows why.
OMG, and it looks to me like Liam is wearing a Spiderman bullet-proof backpack that parents in the US now buy their children to keep them safe from school shooters.
But against America's ICE Gestapo, they don't work.
Now America is furious - Vance and the ICE Gestapo are trying to defend their actions but nobody believes Homeland Security stories anymore.
Vance did a speech today and it didn't go well. I think his message could be summarized as "You all just shut up and obey orders, because the floggings will continue until morale improves!"Front page of tomorrow's Star Tribune.
— Steve Herman (@newsguy.bsky.social) January 22, 2026 at 6:00 PM
[image or embed]
JD Vance: "I'm headed to Minneapolis where we're gonna talk with ICE agents and local officials about how we turn down the chaos. My simple piece of advice to them is going to be if you want to turn down the chaos in Minneapolis, stop fighting immigration enforcement."
— Aaron Rupar (@atrupar.com) January 22, 2026 at 8:48 AM
[image or embed]
CBC News, egregiously both-sidesing fascism once again. At some point, you just need to call out Vance's lies, you guys.
— Dale Smith (@journodale.bsky.social) January 22, 2026 at 9:53 PM
[image or embed]
The last word on Vance's speech:
View on Threads
In other news: Carney made it clear on Tuesday that Trump's Board of Peace had to provide money to help Gaza rebuild. So on Thursday, Trump said "you can't quit, I'm firing you!"
Newsom has this right:
WOW! WHAT AN INCREDIBLE BOARD OF PEACE!
— Governor Newsom Press Office (@govpressoffice.gov.ca.gov) January 22, 2026 at 10:13 AM
[image or embed]
Setting aside the fuzzy question of what does or doesn't need Senate treaty ratification, the "Board of Peace" doesn't seem to be an agreement to which the United States as such is a party at all. It's just in his personal capacity as some random guy.
— Andy Craig (@andycraig.bsky.social) January 22, 2026 at 8:11 PM
View on Threads
View on Threads
In much more important Canadian news, Pierre Poilievre finally released a statement about Carney's Davos speech - Paul Wells has the whole thing here.
View on Threads
View on Threads
And this is a worthwhile analysis:
View on Threads
In her very interesting piece, Kosky makes an important point:
...Poilievre’s statement is not merely reactionary. With his leadership review approaching next week, there is a clear incentive to reassert dominance over the economic narrative. Carney’s Davos speech positioned the Prime Minister as a serious global actor, granting him international stature and strategic credibility. Poilievre’s counter is designed to pull that authority back into domestic grievance politics, where cost of living pressures, affordability anxieties, and economic frustration offer more immediate political leverage.
At the same time, his framing is carefully calibrated for what lies ahead in trade.
The Canada–United States–Mexico Agreement contains a formal review mechanism that will soon become politically active, placing Canada’s trade posture under renewed scrutiny. Against that backdrop, Poilievre’s emphasis on tariffs, American political volatility, trade vulnerability, and national self-reliance is not incidental. It is deliberate groundwork, establishing a narrative of toughness and preparedness ahead of high-stakes negotiations.
In doing so, he is positioning Conservatives as economically firmer, more domestically anchored, and better equipped to withstand U.S. pressure. This is not simply partisan criticism. It is trade strategy framing, designed to shape public expectations long before negotiations formally begin.
This exchange reveals something far more consequential than partisan sparring. Canada is now operating in a post-stability world, where trade, security, and domestic affordability no longer exist as separate policy areas but function as a single, interconnected system. Decisions in one arena now ripple directly through the others, collapsing traditional boundaries between domestic and foreign policy.
Prime Minister Carney is articulating a global systems response to that reality, framing Canada’s strategy through long-term positioning, diversified partnerships, and structural resilience. Pierre Poilievre, by contrast, is forcing a domestic accountability lens onto the same moment, redirecting attention toward cost of living pressures, fiscal discipline, and immediate economic performance.
Both approaches are politically rational. Only one will define the dominant narrative....
6 comments:
According to US House Speaker Mike Johnson, $1 billion gets you a permanent seat on the Board of Peace. So, who do I make the cheque out to? I'll bet it's not the US Treasury. This is just another grift.
I read through most of the Poilievre response . . . skipped a couple of bits that seemed skippable. And while I didn't like it, and I didn't agree with it, and I thought everything he said about affordability was stuff that he doesn't actually care about and would make worse given the chance . . .
It was not as bad as his usual schtick. He must have found an adult to write it, because it at least had some reasonable points to make. That kind of worries me.
I am worried that too many Canadians will think Carney isn't quite good enough, let's give that other guy a chance
Yes it is
You do have to wonder what a billion dollars buys you. It is doubtful the money will be used to help the Palestinians but I'm sure the boys will have fun spending it. The countries which joined the new club are all on the list of people/countries you don't invite to dinner unless you're one of them or an idiot desperate for people to kiss you ring.
PP just can't get past himself. Hearing the first few lines, thought, that's nice, a compliment and then he reverts to his usual self. Unpleasant, Unpleasant, Unpleasant. PP is simply not fit to be P.M. or even the leader of the opposition. Carney just got a standing ovation at Davos, which is rare. P.P. could have gotten himself some decent press if he had simply congratulated Carney on the speech and left it at that.
My concern is that little peace club, which is made up of some unpleasant people, maybe the end of Israel. Nothing says they can not use those billions to wage war on Israel. Israel has nuclear weapons, they may have to use them. It is notable that the major Arab countries didn't join, neither did Russia or China or NATO countries. Give the fascist state the U.S.A. has become it would not surprise me that he and Miller pick up where the Nazis left off and proceed with Hitler's "final solutuion"
When ICE arrested the little 5 year old boy and put him in an interment camp it brought back the list of names in our maternal grandfather's family which the Nazi's murdered. It included a two year old niece. These people will stop at nothing. Have Americans forgotten about how trump treated children during his first term, seperating them from their parents. Put them in detention camps in horrible conditions. We still don't know where some of the children are.
When I see those ICE agents violating the American Constitution and killing and harming people I always wonder how many of them were the rioters on 6 Jan who donni pardoned.
What ICE is currently doing is what I heard the parental units and their friends discussing back in the 1950s, all having come from the Netherlands after the war. Breaking down doors, shooting people, arresting children, brutalizing people, ruining their homes, detention camps. I'm just waiting for donni to open the death camps. Our Mom used to say, "its not Never Again", its "It can happen again". We had Cambodia, Rawanda, etc. and now we have the U.S.A.
I'm just waiting for the next shoe to drop, i.e. no mid term elections.
I love most of Paul Simon's work. One song always rankled me as being brain-dead-American centric. It has new import today:
"We come in the age's most uncertain hour
And sing an American tune"
Post a Comment